Atheist Richard Dawkins: “The introduction of cannibalism as the other white meat”
Noted atheist intellectual and totally normal person Richard Dawkins is curious about lab-grown meat. More specifically, the author of The God Delusion is curious about lab-grown human meat. That’s right, the other other white meat. On Saturday, the outspoken critic of intelligent design and creationism tweeted an article about lab-grown meat from The Independent, along with some questions meant to spur thought and discussion. “Tissue culture ‘clean meat’ already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this,” he writes. “What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus ‘yuck reaction’ absolutism.”
With the Earth’s meat-eaters outpacing the planet’s resources, lab-grown meat could offer an alternative to beef, chicken, and pork that doesn’t put as much of a strain on the environment. And while the cost of these cultured “meats” is still prohibitively high, they have gotten cheaper and will probably continue to do so.
Dawkins’ question sounds more than a little creepy, but it’s not a terrible one. After all, even if lab-grown meat resembles human muscle, it’s not coming from an actual living person, so theoretically it shouldn’t be subject to the same disgust response that humans have evolved to avoid disease-carrying foods. Plus, he invokes consequentialism, the ethical principle that says an action should be judged on the basis of its consequences. If eating lab-grown human flesh does no more harm than eating lab-grown cow flesh, argues Dawkins, then why should the “yuck reaction” negate the potential benefit?
Regardless of the consequences, Dawkins’ public musings seem kind of disturbing. As Twitter user Derek Davison points out, it’s kind of odd that human meat is the first place Dawkins goes with this information.